The case of the new bridge in Dnipro: A 71-year-old suspect was held in custody without a judge issuing a ruling—as Konstantin Globa, a partner and attorney at Barristers Law Firm, explained on his Facebook page:

“Meet Judge N.Y. Viktorovich, who, without issuing a ruling or drafting the text of a court order, ordered that my client be held in custody.

This is nonsense, but the case file contains no audio recording of the court hearing, nor does it contain Judge Viktorovich N.Y.’s ruling itself—AS OF YESTERDAY, THE ORIGINAL RULING DID NOT EXIST IN PHYSICAL FORM!

Instead, the case file contains only a “Word” draft of the ruling that does not comply with any of the requirements or formalities mandatory for a court ruling...

Yesterday, in the appellate court, we identified and brought this fact to light; instead of immediately releasing the individual, the appellate court adjourned the hearing without allowing the defense attorneys to defend their client’s rights during the court session.

Most likely, Judge Viktorovich N.Y. will today somehow draft the text of the ruling and “tailor” its paragraphs to match the “Word draft,” which has been filed in the case materials without the required details.

We’ll see how the appellate court reacts to any potential manipulation.”

 




Author: Court Reporter

Source: southern-report.com.ua

Write us

You need a consultation — contact us

I accept privacy policy